Response Option Comparisons & Tradeoffs – Minibytes #5

Minibytes by Al Allen Unfortunately, some people still consider the use of chemical dispersants and the controlled burning of oil as “alternative” oil spill response options. Decades of research, controlled field trials and experience during actual oil spills have proven that the application of chemical dispersants and the use of controlled burning can easily match

Response Option Comparisons & Tradeoffs – Minibytes #5 Read More »

Encounter Rate In Oil Spill Response Explained – Minibytes #2

Minibytes by Al Allen The rate at which one can encounter a specific volume of floating oil is one of the most important parameters in the overall assessment of a given response system’s ability to access and eliminate spilled oil. Regardless of the type of system under consideration (i.e., skimming, burning or applying chemical dispersants),

Encounter Rate In Oil Spill Response Explained – Minibytes #2 Read More »

The Test of a Good Skimmer is a Good Test

Since the early 1990s, when the U.S. Coast Guard regulations codifying the Oil Pollution Act 90 came into force, some spill response equipment manufacturers assigned unrealistic Nameplate Capacity ratings to their oil skimmers, loosely based on the ability of an integral pump to move water through the system. (Nameplate Capacity is the number used to represent skimmer performance.) But

The Test of a Good Skimmer is a Good Test Read More »

Scroll to Top